Modified Misgav Ladach Method versus Pfannenstiel Kerr Method in Women with Previous Cesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial

نویسندگان

  • Ahmed Elnaggar
  • Mohamed Abdel-Hafeez
  • Mohamed Abdelghani Abdelaziz
چکیده

is 15%, ranging from 3.5% in Africa to 29.2% in Latin America and the Caribbean [2]. There is no universal surgical technique for cesarean section. The wide variation in surgical techniques in practice can be attributed to many factors namely the clinical situation and the preference of the surgeon [3]. Various abdominal incisions have been applied for cesarean delivery [3]. They include transverse incision (Pfannenstiel, Maylard, Cherney and Joel-Cohen) and vertical incision (midline and para median) [3]. All-over the world, the transverse suprapubic skin incision is the most common technique performed for cesarean section followed by Pfannenstiel incision and Joel-Cohen abdominal incision. Pfannenstiel authenticated the Pfannenstiel incision in 1900; it is a horizontal skin incision about 2 cm above pubic symphysis [4].

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND Modifications to the classic cesarean section technique described by Pfannenstiel and Kerr have been proposed in the last few years. The objective of this trial was to compare intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between the Pfannenstiel-Kerr and the modified Misgav-Ladach (MML) techniques for cesarean section. METHODS This prospective randomized trial involved 162 ...

متن کامل

Maternal and Fetal Effect of Misgav Ladach Cesarean Section in Nigerian Women: A Randomized Control Study

BACKGROUND The poor utilisation of the Misgav-Ladach (ML) caesarean section method in our environment despite its proven advantage has been attributed to several factors including its non-evaluation. A well designed and conducted trial is needed to provide evidence to convince clinician of its advantage over Pfannenstiel based methods. AIM To evaluate the outcome of ML based caesarean section...

متن کامل

A Comparative Study between Modified Misgav Ladach Technique and Pfannensteil Method of Lower Segment Caesarean Section

Objective: To compare modified Misgav ladach technique of LSCS with conventional method. Method: This was a prospective study conducted over 200 patients undergoing primary LSCS for various reasons. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 100 each; group A underwent LSCS by the Misgav ladach method and group B by the conventional method. The peri operative and short term postoperati...

متن کامل

The Misgav Ladach method: a step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section.

INTRODUCTION Caesarean delivery remains the most common intraperitoneal surgical procedure in obstetric and gynaecologic practice. Since time immemorial there have been countless efforts to improve the technique of caesarean section. One such innovative breakthrough technique is the Misgav Ladach method of caesarean of section. The objective of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and s...

متن کامل

Misgav-Ladach cesarean section: general consideration.

Among obstetric techniques, cesarean section seemed to represent a well-defined procedure and significant advances in this intervention were considered to be unlikely. However, obstetric surgery has recently undergone many improvements. In 1972, Joel-Cohen presented a new method for transverse incision of the abdomen. This method, with some modifications, was integrated into the Misgav-Ladach c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017